USPTO serial 75765038
BOOKSTORE MANAGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 2003
- Examiner
- PERKINS, KARLA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with BOOKSTORE MANAGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ABILENE, TX
Abilene, TX
ABILENE, TX
Abilene, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christina J. Moser
Christina J. Moser BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP127 Public SquareKey Tower, Suite 2000Cleveland, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for use in performing inventory control management, business management and point of sale functions directed towards bookstores | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BOOKSTORE MANAGER, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Voorhees, Randy J.
- Other trademarks owned by BOOKSTORE MANAGER, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Voorhees, Randy J.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BOOKSTORE MANAGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 23, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 22, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |