Drawing for GOEDISON.COM

USPTO serial 75765323

GOEDISON.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OTTE, SARAH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOEDISON.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles F. Reidelbach, Jr.

CHARLES F REIDELBACH JR110 W C STSTE 714SAN DIEGO, CA 92101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers and related products Consumer electronics and related productsACTIVE—
016Paper productsACTIVE—
018Leather goods; bagsACTIVE—
020Novelty goods made of plastics and other materialsACTIVE—
021Drinking mugs and glasswareACTIVE—
025ClothingACTIVE—
035Retail and wholesale sales of electronic goodsACTIVE—
037Installation, diagnostic and repair services relating to electronic goodsACTIVE—
041Educational training and services related to electronic goodsACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely consulting, designing and rendering technical aid and assistanceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance