USPTO serial 75765967
GOLD LEAF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOLD LEAF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Olmsted, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel H Bock
JOEL H BOCK DORN MCEACHRAN JAMBOR & KEATING55 E MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | FAUCETS FOR USE IN KITCHENS, LAVATORIES, AND ROMAN TUBS; TUB SPOUTS; SHOWER/TUB CONTROL VALVES; TUB WASTES AND OVERFLOWS; BIDETS; SHOWER HEADS AND BODY SPRAY HEADS; HAND- HELD SHOWERS AND SLIDE BARS THEREFOR; SHOWER GRAB BAGS; SHOWER ACCESSORY HOLDERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | BATH ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, TOWEL BARS, TOWEL RINGS, TOOTHBRUSH HOLDERS, TOILET TISSUE HOLDERS, SOAP DISHES AND CUP HOLDERS; AND WALL- MOUNTED STEMS AND COUNTERTOP PEDESTALS FOR SUPPORTING VARIOUS COMBINATIONS OF THE FOREGOING BATH ACCESSORIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |