USPTO serial 75766180
4WEBMED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 27, 2005
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with 4WEBMED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Miramar, FL, US
FOOD MARKETING CONSULTANTS, INC.
MIRAMAR, FL, US
Miramar, FL, US
Miramar, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STANLEY B, KITA
STANLEY B, KITA HOWSON & HOWSON LLP350 Sentry ParkwayBuilding 620, Suite 210Blue Bell, PA 19422Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Food for medically restricted diets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 18, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tammara, Jonathan C
- Other trademarks owned by FOOD MARKETING CONSULTANTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Tammara, Jonathan C
- Other trademarks owned by Tammara, Jonathan C
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named 4WEBMED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 22, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 22, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |