USPTO serial 75766321
BEMER 3000
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEMER 3000?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FL-9495 Triesen, LI
FL-9495 Triesen, LI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN J. DEVENNY
JOHN J DEVENNY FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU P866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical device, namely, electromagnetic field apparatus with extremely low frequencies for the dilation of blood vessels, improvement of blood circulation and micro-circulation, increased oxygen saturation and oxygen partial pressure, improvement of the blood's fluidity and inhibition of the formation of blood clots | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising agencies for the advertising of medical information through newspapers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INNOMED INTERNATIONAL AG
- Other trademarks owned by INNOMED INTERNATIONAL AG
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named BEMER 3000
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |