USPTO serial 75766367
20.20 FAULTVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 20.20 FAULTVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. Timar
JOHN J TIMAR WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICEONE ATLANTIC CTR1201 W PEACHTREE ST STE 3500ATLANTA, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | OPERATIONAL SUPPORT SYSTEM SOFTWARE, NAMELY, A SET OF PROGRAMS FOR USE BY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS TO MONITOR, CONTROL, ANALYZE, MANAGE PROBLEMS WITH A TELEPHONE OR COMPUTER NETWORK, ORDER AND KEEP TRACK OF NETWORK COMPONENTS, TRACK USAGE, BILLING AND REPORTING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Enterprise Network Applications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Enterprise Network Applications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named 20.20 FAULTVIEW
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |