USPTO serial 75766659
FX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2601702Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2002
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric R. Waltmire
Eric R. Waltmire The Law Office of Randall T. Erickson, P.C.1749 S. Naperville Rd, Suite 202Wheaton, IL 60189UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | SLICING BLADES FOR POWER TOOLS USED IN COMESTIBLE SLICING SYSTEMS | EXPIRED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |