USPTO serial 75766956
THEMEDOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGGY, AUMA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THEMEDOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodland Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew J. Cohen
MATTHEW J COHEN755 NAVY STSANTA MONICA, CA 90405UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others by arranging for sponsors to affiliate their goods and services with tradeshows in the nature of global computer network services; promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing advertisements in an electronic magazine accessed though a global computer network; promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of discount cards; promoting the events of others; placing advertisement for others; rental of advertising; dissemination of advertising matter | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |