USPTO serial 75767008
OLIOVITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2893665Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 12, 2004
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OLIOVITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1069 - Ciudad de Buenos Aires, AR
1069 - Ciudad de Buenos Aires, AR
1069 - Ciudad de Buenos Aires, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yate K. Cutliff
YATE K CUTLIFF PENDORF & CUTLIFF5111 MEMORIAL HWYTAMPA, FL 33634-7356UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Edible oil, cooking oil, edible fats and cooking fats and packaged processed olives, in cans or bottles or pouches | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jun 15, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2005 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |