USPTO serial 75767075
BEAR FEET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2729497Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 24, 2003
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEAR FEET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Berkeley, CA
Berkeley, CA
Berkeley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maureen Beacom Gorman
Maureen Beacom Gorman Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP233 South Wacker Drive6300 Willis TowerChicago, IL 60606-6357Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Candy and cookies in the shape of a bear and a foot | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 10, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 31, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 14, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |