USPTO serial 75767877
SMART VISIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMART VISIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen Dana Oster
KAREN DANA OSTER MILLER, NASH, WIENER, HAGER ET AL111 S W FIFTH AVE STE 3500PORTLAND, OR 97204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | SERVICING AND MARKETING OF HEALTH AND SAFETY-RELATED PRODUCTS 12 USED TO PROMOTE SAFETY, NAMELY KITS USED TO ORGANIZE INFORMATION USED TO TRACK MISSING CHILDREN, KITS FOR BOATING SAFETY AND PREPAREDNESS, KITS FOR CRIME PREVENTION AND PREPAREDNESS, KITS FOR AUTOMOBILE SAFETY AND PREPAREDNESS, FIRST AID KITS, KITS FOR HUNTING SAFETY AND PREPAREDNESS, KITS FOR FISHING SAFETY AND PREPAREDNESS, AND KITS FOR OUTDOOR SAFETY AND PREPAREDNESS, | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |