Drawing for RUSH

USPTO serial 75768162

RUSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J ALLISON STRICKLAND

J ALLISON STRICKLAND FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014watch straps and bandsACTIVE—
016writing instrumentsACTIVE—
018backpacks, fanny packs, all purpose sport bags, duffel bags, walletsACTIVE—
021water bottles for beverages, sold empty; portable beverage can coolers; portable coolers, canteensACTIVE—
028exercise equipment, namely, exercise weights, gymnasium exercise mats, exercise trampolines, exercise treadmills, exercise bars, stationary exercise bicycles, exercise equipment for lateral movement in a skating motion, stair-stepping machines, exercise equipment in the nature of abdomen tightening devices, and jump ropesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2002PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 24, 2001PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2001PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 17, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 3, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 2, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 1, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance