Drawing for @GRESSO

USPTO serial 75768326

@GRESSO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with @GRESSO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SVERRE DAVID ROANG

SVERRE DAVID ROANG STROUD, WILLINK & HOWARD LLC25 W MII0 ST STE 300P O BOX 2236MADISON, WI 53701-2234

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTERS; DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, DATA PROCESSORS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED FOR MANAGEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN THE FIELD OF GENERAL BUSINESS OPERATIONS, ALL FOR USE WITH COMPUTERSACTIVE—
042COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER AND TECHNICAL CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE, INCLUDING THE USE OF COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEMSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 200044EASEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED—
Jan 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance