Drawing for EUROWIZ

USPTO serial 75768948

EUROWIZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EUROWIZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank J. Benasutti

FRANK J BENASUTTI BENASUTTI, PA4800 N FEDERAL HWY STE 300DBOCA RATON, FL 33431UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software tool to evaluate application programs for euro functionality, that is the ablity to process financial transactions using the Euro monetary unit, by parsing the code and identifying the monetary fields that require further auditACTIVEJul 29, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Mar 8, 2001CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Feb 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 25, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jan 22, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Aug 22, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 30, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 28, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 1, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 10, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance