USPTO serial 75769284
BRINGING INNOVATION HOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRINGING INNOVATION HOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J Streeter
WILLIAM J STREETER MAYTAG CORPORATION403 W FOURTH ST NP O BOX 39NEWTON, IA 50208-0039Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | CLOTHES WASHING MACHINES, DISHWASHING MACHINES, GARBAGE DISPOSALS AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | CLOTHES DRYERS, ELECTRIC AND GAS COOKING STOVES, ELECTRIC AND GAS COOKING STOVE UNITS, NAMELY, OVENS RANGES, BROILERS, GRILLS, GRIDDLES, AND MOTOR DRIVEN ROTISSERIES, ELECTRIC AND GAS COOK TOPS, MICROWAVE OVENS FOR COOKING, ELECTRIC AND GAS COOKING GRILLS, ELECTRIC WALL OVENS FOR DOMESTIC USE, REFRIGERATORS, FREEZERS, REFRIGERATOR-FREEZERS AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |