Drawing for CARBONZERO

USPTO serial 75769810

CARBONZERO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARBONZERO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MIDGE M HYMAN

MIDGE M HYMAN COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004HYDROGEN STORED IN LIQUID ORGANIC HYDRIDE FORM, METALLIC HYDRIDE FORM, COMPRESSED GAS FORM, AND LIQUID FORM FOR USE AS A FUEL IN THE AUTOMOTIVE, AEROSPACE, RAIL, SHIPPING AND STATIONARY POWER INDUSTRIESACTIVE—
007HYDROGEN PRODUCTION MACHINES, MOTORS, MACHINE COUPLINGS, AND PARTS THEREFORE FOR INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING USEACTIVE—
042CONSULTING SERVICES REGARDING HYDROGEN USESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance