USPTO serial 75769812
CARBONLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARBONLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, M9C 1B9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Midge M. Hyman
MIDGE M HYMAN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | HYDROGEN STORED LIQUID ORGANIC HYDRIDE FORM, METALLIC HYDRIDE FORM, COMPRESSED GAS FORM, AND LIQUID FORM FOR USE AS A FUEL IN THE AUTOMOTIVE, AEROSPACE, RAIL, SHIPPING AND STATIONARY POWER INDUSTRIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | HYDROGEN PRODUCTION MACHINES, MOTORS, MACHINE COUPLINGS, AND PARTS THEREFORE FOR INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | CONSULTING SERVICES REGARDING HYDROGEN USE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |