USPTO serial 75770091
BRAINY BABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 16, 2004
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BRAINY BABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ALPHARETTA, GA
ALPHARETTA, GA
Alpharetta, GA
Alpharetta, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee B. Beitchman
LEE B BEITCHMAN BEITCHMAN & HUDSONP O BOX 7929ATLANTA, GA 30357-7929UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games, playthings and educational toys all for children, namely, baby's rattles; board games; crib mobiles; baby multiple activity toys; card games; stuffed toy animals; cube, manipulative and jigsaw puzzles; bath toys; water wing swim aids for recreational use; kick board flotation devices for recreational use; and inflatable flotation devices for recreational use, namely, tubes and similar-shaped objects | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 18, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BRAINY BABY COMPANY, LLC, THE
- Other trademarks owned by BRAINY BABY COMPANY, LLC, THE
- Other trademarks owned by Small Fry Productions
- Other trademarks owned by Small Fry Productions
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named BRAINY BABY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |