USPTO serial 75771719
E SPEED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E SPEED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND ST, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation, maintenance, and repair of data processing equipment, telecommunication networks and other telecommunication products | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, providing telecommunications connections to the internet, monitoring the operation of telecommunication networks for others | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Consultation in the setting up and operation of data processing systems, and consultation in the setting up and operation of databases and telecommunication networks; evaluation of business needs and advising businesses on the use of telecommunication and information processing systems and equipment for improving efficiency and customer satisfaction; designing information processing and telecommunication systems and equipment for others; consultation in the field of telecommunications and data processing, namely, consulting services regarding systems integration and product integration; testing the operation of telecommunications and data processing equipment for others; testing the inter-operation of telecommunication and data processing systems and products for others; development and design of data processing computer programs for others; rental of data processing computer programs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Siemens Business Services GmbH & Co. OHG
- Other trademarks owned by Siemens Business Services GmbH & Co. OHG
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named E SPEED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |