Drawing for SUNDANCE

USPTO serial 75771774

SUNDANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNDANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norman Zafman

NORMAN ZAFMAN BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032drinking water, mineral water, seltzer water, soda water, spring water, table water, carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 3, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 2, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 28, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 23, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 18, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 14, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 3, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 2, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 11, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 25, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance