USPTO serial 75771826
OSTEO PADINOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OSTEO PADINOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Holly M Ford
HOLLY M FORD BANNER & WITCOFF LTD1001 G ST NW 11TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4597UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | dentifrice, gingival gel for farm animals | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | veterinary products, namely, preparations for the treatment of osteoarthritis and osteoporosis in animals, nutritional supplements for farm animals, animal food supplements to strengthen bone mass and to treat discomfort due to osteoarthritis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |