Drawing for SWEET SAVER

USPTO serial 75772109

SWEET SAVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEE, TERESA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SWEET SAVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Baker

Stephen L Baker Baker and Rannells PA575 Route 28Suite 102Raritan, NJ 08869

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Sugar and sugar substitutesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 7, 2001OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
May 7, 2001ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
May 7, 2001OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Aug 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 2, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 17, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance