USPTO serial 75772181
KUNG FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KUNG FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Lambertsen
JOHN C LAMBERTSEN KENEHAN & LAMBERTSEN LTD1771 E FLAMINGO RD STE 117-BLAS VEGAS, NV 89119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CHINESE ENTREES, INCLUDING TERIYAKI, SZECHWAN, LO MIEN, CHOW MEIN, SWEET AND SOUR, KUNG PAO, AND BEEF and BROCCOLI ENTREES; CHINESE BOWLS, INCLUDING TERIYAKI, SZECHWAN, LO MIEN, CHOW MEIN, SWEET AND SOUR, KUNG PAO, AND BEEF and BROCCOLI BOWLS; AND CHINESE APPETIZERS, INCLUDING EGG ROLLS; VEGETABLE, CHICKEN, AND PORK EGG ROLLS; SPRING ROLLS; VEGETABLE SPRING ROLLS; DUMPLINGS; PORK, AND CHICKEN DUMPLINGS; WONTONS; AND POTSTICKERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |