USPTO serial 75772419
ETV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ETV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MIRIAM CLAIRE BEEZY
MIRIAM CLAIRE BEEZY FOLEY & LARDNER LLP2029 CENTURY PARK E STE 3500LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | transmission of multimedia content via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, the production of comedic, reality or video clips, game and quiz formats, multimedia content, family, dramatic, information, animated, news, sports, weather, music, fashion, culinary arts, history, health and fitness, home and lifestyle, travel, science, technology, and hoisted talk show formats distributed via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, creating indices of information, sites, and other resources available on a global computer network for others; searching and retrieving information, sites, and other resources available on a global computer network; providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; providing links to news, international content, science, technology, entertainment, weather, sports, recreation, home and lifestyle, music, travel, culinary arts, history, health and fitness information and content on a global computer network; providing multiple-user access to a global computer network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information; providing a wide range of general interest information via a global computer network; computer bulletin and message boards in the fields of general interest | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 31, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |