USPTO serial 75772675
# CRUISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, LAURIEL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with # CRUISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RANDY K. STERNS
RANDY K STERNS BUSH ROSS GARDNER WARREN & RUDY, PA220 S FRANKLIN STTAMPA, FL 33602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |