USPTO serial 75773445
IPRIORI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IPRIORI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Billerica, MA
North Billerica, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. DuPre
JOHN L DUPRE HAMILTON BROOK SMITH & REYNOLDS PC530 VIRGINA RDCONCORD, MA 01742-9133UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CONFIGURING AND OPERATING SWITCH ROUTERS | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |