Drawing for PRECISION CLINICAL PROFILES

USPTO serial 75773448

PRECISION CLINICAL PROFILES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TOLPIN, BRETT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRECISION CLINICAL PROFILES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Judith R. S. Stern

JUDITH R S STERN BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP125 SUMMER STBOSTON, MA 02110-1618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042providing health, medical, pharmaceutical, nutraceutical and toxicological information; health technology services; research, development and testing for others in the fields of medicine, pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals and toxicologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance