USPTO serial 75774240
E-DOTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-DOTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ST. PAUL, MN
Fort Worth, TX
Fort Worth, TX
FORT WORTH, TX
FORT WORTH, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAN K SIMPSON
EDWARD R COURTNEY ECOLAB INC370 WABASHA ST NECOLAB CTR ERC-840ST PAUL, MN 55102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for generating customer printed labels for food rotation management | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ECOLAB INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DAYDOTS LABEL COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DAYDOTS LABEL COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DAYDOTS HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DAYDOTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named E-DOTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2004 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |