USPTO serial 75774467
CELL SIGNALING TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2583920Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 18, 2002
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CELL SIGNALING TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy C. Wilker
Steven A. Abreu Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP125 Summer StreetBoston, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Antibodies for the detection of signaling molecules, post-translational modifications on signaling molecules, non-radioactive kinase and other enzyme assays, kinase and other enzyme inhibitors designed for use in biotechnological and biomedical research | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CELL SIGNALING TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CELL SIGNALING TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Comb, Michael J.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named CELL SIGNALING TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |