USPTO serial 75775587
EFRONTIERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EFRONTIERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN D ANDERSON
BRIAN D ANDERSON OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY 4TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | On-line electronic based platform for matching and selecting financial management talent for large capital investment funds and accounts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |