Drawing for ARTSTAR

USPTO serial 75775770

ARTSTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARTSTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James F. Biagi, Jr

JAMES F BIAGI JR MONAHAN & BIAGI, PLLC701 FIFTH AVE STE 5701SEATTLE, WA 98104-7003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Electronic retailing services via a global computer information network featuring works of art, books, magazines and art-related merchandise; auctioning services; cooperative advertising and marketing of works of art, books, magazines and art-related merchandise; purchasing agents; and providing an on-line interactive computer database in the field of art galleriesACTIVE—
036Appraisals for insurance claims of personal propertyACTIVE—
037Restoration in the field of works of artACTIVE—
039Arranging travel tours; and computer services, namely, providing virtual reality art tours and virtual reality art exhibitions via a global computer information networkACTIVE—
041Providing an on-line interactive computer database in the field of artist biographies, art festival, educational institutes and courses, art exhibitions and work titlesACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining artist biographies, and information on artist biographies, and information on art festivals, education institutes and courses, art exhibitions, and galleries and work titles; authentication in the field of works or art; and consultation in the field of artACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 13, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance