USPTO serial 75776027
FUSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Scott Evans
J SCOTT EVANS ADAMS LAW FIRM PA2180 TWO FIRST UNION PLZ301 S TRYON STCHARLOTTE, NC 28282Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Dinnerware, chinaware and glassware, namely, cups, saucers, plates, dishes, bowls, soup tureens, serving platters not of precious metal, mugs, jugs, sugar bowls, salt and pepper pots, beverage pots, drinking glasses, tumblers and decanters; candleholders not of precious metal, vases and serving trays | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |