Drawing for TRUE BEAUTY BY EMME ARONSON

USPTO serial 75776183

TRUE BEAUTY BY EMME ARONSON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUE BEAUTY BY EMME ARONSON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERIC D. OFFNER

ERIC D OFFNER20 JOY DRNEW HYDE PARK, NY 11040UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Sportswear and athletic wear namely sweat suits, sweat bands and sweat shirts; Blouses, pants, shirts, jackets, coats, dresses, scarves, gloves, hosiery, socks, swimsuits; T-shirts, intimate apparel namely panties, lounge wear, underwear, bras, pajamas, dresses; Shoes, athletic shoes, casual shoes, formal shoes, work shoes and slippersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 1, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 1, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 8, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 1, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 26, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Jul 16, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2001IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Aug 15, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 23, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 13, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance