USPTO serial 75776217
RT-LAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RT-LAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN IPTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVE TOWN OF OSSINGWESTCHESTER COUNTY, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in designing and implementing complex non-real time, and real time computer systems through the distribution of codes, executed on one or several processors for applications in energy, aviation, naval, aerospace, automotive, electricity and robotics | ACTIVE | Dec 21, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |