USPTO serial 75776482
EPUPPIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPUPPIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD F MANDELBAUM
HOWARD F MANDELBAUM LEVINE & MANDELBAUM444 MADISON AVE 35TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video game cartridges; video game discs; computer game programs; computer game software; computer game tapes; computer game cartridges; and computer game cassettes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely, dolls, puppets, plush toy animals, plastic toy animals, toy animal figurines, toy vehicles, toy guns, board games, card games, jigsaw puzzles, water sports equipment, namely, boogie boards and balls and nets for water volleyball, toy tables, toy chairs, toy balls, sports balls, ice skates, roller skates, in-line skates, checker sets, chess sets, Christmas tree decorations; handheld unit for playing video games; handheld unit for playing computer games | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing a website on global computer networks featuring adoption, breeding, nursing, feeding, raising and training of virtual pets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Leisure Concepts, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Leisure Concepts, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named EPUPPIES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |