USPTO serial 75776500
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Santa Barbara, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Internet information services; namely custom internet software, internet information, development, hosting of information on the internet | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |