Drawing for LIVING BETTER LONGER

USPTO serial 75776753

LIVING BETTER LONGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIVING BETTER LONGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin G Smith

KEVIN G SMITH SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK & SEAS PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Publications, namely, magazines in the fields of health, fitness, diet, exercise and lifestyleACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 23, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 23, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 12, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 10, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 2, 2004REINREINSTATED—
Feb 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 25, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 18, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 25, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance