USPTO serial 75776809
BIOSCREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOSCREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75016 Paris, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JORDAN B. BIERMAN
JORDAN B BIERMAN BIERMAN, MUSERLIAN AND LUCAS600 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes, colognes, toilet water, essential oils for personal use; hair lotions; dentifrices; and cosmetics, namely- soaps, emulsions, namely emulsions for use as a moisturizer for the hands, the body and the-face, skin lotions, toilet creams for use on the body, face and hands, cold creams, cleaning creams, namely skin cleaning creams, hand creams, nourishing creams, namely, moisturizing creams for the skin, for the hands and for the body, suntan creams, sunscreen creams, suntan lotions, sunscreen lotions, suntan oils, suntan milk, after-shave lotions, bath salts, not far medical purposes, skin milk, namely; skin cleansing milk and skin moisturizing milk, skin fresheners, namely scented body spray, non-medicated lip balm, lip glosses, mask packs, namely, mask packs consisting primarily of facial masks and face lotions, make-up removing preparations, cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes, namely, creams forcellulite reduction and lotions for cellulite reduction, deodorant for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of dermatological and stomatological disorders, namely, medicated creams for protection, care and reparation of skin, nails, hair, mucous membrane, teeth and gums, antibacterial pharmaceuticals, antiseptic preparations, pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of hair loss, hair itch and dandruff, pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of eczema, pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of acne, pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of burns, anti-dehydration preparations, anti-itch preparations and pharmaceutical preparations, namely sanitizers for household use and all purpose disinfectants | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Medical services; sanitation engineering; beauty salon services; scientific and industrial research in the fields of health and beauty | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |