USPTO serial 75776887
NOCOST.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOCOST.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Malcolm B. Wittenberg
MALCOLM B WITTENBERG CROSBY, HEAFEY, ROACH & MAYTWO EMBARCADERO CTRSTE 2000SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4106Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | GATHERING DATA REGARDING CONSUMER GOODS OVER A WORLDWIDE COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 24, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |