USPTO serial 75776895
HERCULETE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HERCULETE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Schwartz
ROBERT M SCHWARTZ ESQ RUDEN, MCCLOSKY, SMITHSCHUSTER & RUSSELL, PA 200 E BROWARDBLVD PO BOX 1900FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33302-1900Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL COMPOSITION, NAMELY, CONCRETE CHEMICAL EXPANSION AGENT FOR USE IN CONCRETE MIXES | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | CONCRETE BUILDING MATERIALS, NAMELY BRICKS, BLOCKS, POSTS, SLABS, FLOOR PANELS, WALL PANELS, ROOF PANELS, JOISTS, TRUSSES, LINTELS, SOUND ATTENUATION BARRIERS, MINE AIR STOPS, AND CONCRETE MIXES | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | SYNTHETIC FIBERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Herculete LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Herculete LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Similar marks named HERCULETE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 31, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 31, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 31, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |