USPTO serial 75777126
FRESCOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 15, 2002
- Examiner
- GORMAN, MAUREEN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FRESCOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sanford E Warren Jr
SANFORD E WARREN JR WARREN & KENNEDY, LLP6565 N MACARTHUR STE 910IRVING, TX 75039-2461UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | BEVERAGES, NAMELY, FLAVORED MILKS WITH FRUIT, CARAMEL OR COFFEE FLAVORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 2, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |