USPTO serial 75777235
SEASONING SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 26, 2002
- Examiner
- LOHR, AMY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SEASONING SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Patrick SAGE
G. Patrick SAGE HUESCHEN & SAGE, PLLC107 WEST MICHIGAN AVENUESEVENTH FLOOR, KALAMAZOO BUILDINGKALAMAZOO, MI 49007Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business manufacturing auditing, namely plant audits to assist with hazard analysis critical control points; conducting marketing studies in the nature of sensory consumer panels to measure consumer preference for and commercial viability of finished food products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 18, 2000 |
| 042 | product development consultation services for food processors, namely, consultation in the field of food product development and food product improvement services, testing of new products for others, namely oxidative shelf life testing of key ingredients and finished food products, reviewing manufacturing practices to assure compliance with food industry laws and regulations; product development for others, namely, custom flavor development to help differentiate food products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 18, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kalsec, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Kalsec, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Kalsec, Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SEASONING SOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 31, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 31, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 29, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 31, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 2, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |