USPTO serial 75777415
Serial No. 75777415
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75777415?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven R. Gursky and Mary L. Grieco
STEVEN R GURSKY & MARY L GRIECO DREIER LLP499 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | FULL LINE OF BAGS, NAMELY, ALL PURPOSE SPORTS AND ATHLETE BAGS, OVERNIGHT BAGS, BOOKS BAGS, BACKPACKS, HANDBAGS, WALLETS, TRI-FOLD BILLFOLDS, HIP-FOLD BILLFOLDS, CREDIT CARD CASES, CREDIT CARD MONEY FOLDS, TRAVEL KIT BAGS SOLD EMPTY, LUGGAGE, PURSES, COIN PURSES, COSMETIC CASES, TOTE BAGS, CARRY-ON TOTE BAGS, BRIEFCASES, TRAVEL BAGS, DUFFEL BAGS, CLOTH SHOPPING BAGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |