USPTO serial 75777716
SLURPLICIOUS SPAGHETTI N' FRANKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2003
- Examiner
- REDDICK, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SLURPLICIOUS SPAGHETTI N' FRANKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Scottsdale, AZ
DUSSELDORF, DE
Scottsdale, AZ
Scottsdale, AZ
MOUNTAIN LAKES, NJ
Mountain Lakes, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca S. Nittle
Michael D. Fishman Rader, Fishman & Grauer PLLCSuite 14039533 Woodward AvenueBloomfield Hills, MI 48304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Shelf stable, microwavable foods, namely pasta based entrees with meat | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Armour Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HENKEL KGAA
- Other trademarks owned by Armour Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Armour Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PINNACLE FOODS GROUP LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SLURPLICIOUS SPAGHETTI N' FRANKS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 13, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |