USPTO serial 75778193
COLT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London NW1 5JD, GB
London NW1 5JD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin E. Leace
BENJAMIN E LEACE RATNER & PRESTIA1 WESTLAKES BERWYN STE 301 PO BOX 980VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0980UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing of telecommunications services, namely electronic and wireless transmission of voice, data and video; providing telecommunications connections to a global communication/computer network; telecommunication services, namely, co-location and testing services of voice, data and video communications applications over a global communication/computer network; and satellite transmission services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |