USPTO serial 75778297
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
36050 Pozzoleone (Vicenza), IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Dubno
HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE BOX 900RIVERDALE (BRONX), NY 10471-4900UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | SADDLE FOR BICYCLES AND MOTORCYCLES AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR; STRUCTURAL PARTS FOR BICYCLES AND MOTORCYCLES NAMELY SADDLE MOUNTS, HANDLE BAR GRIPS, PEDALS AND STANDS; BAGS SPECIFICALLY FITTED FOR USE ON BICYCLES AND MOTORCYCLES | ACTIVE | Dec 22, 1998 |
| 020 | FURNITURE; FURNITURE SEATS; CUSHIONS; FURNITURE PARTS, NAMELY ARM-RESTS AND HEAD RESTS | ACTIVE | Dec 22, 1998 |
| 025 | SPORT CLOTHING AND SHOES, NAMELY SOCKS, HEAD BANDS, BIB TIGHTS, JERSEYS, SHIRTS, PANTS, SWEAT SUITS, T-SHIRTS, SHORTS, GLOVES, CAPS, JACKETS, SHOES, SHOE COVERS | ACTIVE | Dec 22, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |