USPTO serial 75778396
EXPRESS MESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXPRESS MESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel H. Bobis
DANIEL H BOBIS LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ, ET600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1497UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC TEXTILES AND FABRICS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FURNITURE AND FOR SEATS IN ALL TYPES OF VEHICLES AND FOR FURNITURE USED IN MEDICAL, DENTAL, HOSPITAL, ADULT CARE FACILITIES, CATERING, HOTEL AND RESTAURANT FACILITIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC TEXTILES AND FABRICS WHICH ALLOW PURCHASERS TO INDICATE REQUIREMENTS AND PROCESS ORDERS WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR HOURS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING AN ON-LINE INTERACTIVE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATIONS OF NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC TEXTILES AND FABRICS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |