USPTO serial 75778428
SUNGENE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNGENE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ludwigshafen am Rhein, DE
Ludwigshafen am Rhein, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacqueline M. Ostroski
JACQUELINE M OSTROSKI BASF CORPORATION3000 CONTINENTAL DR NMOUNT OLIVE, NJ 07828-1234UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals for use in the manufacture of fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, pesticides, plant strengtheners, plant growth regulators and fertilizers for use in agriculture and forestry | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, pesticides for agricultural and horticultural use | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | agricultural, horticultural and forestry products, namely, grains for planting, seeds and live animals and plants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |