Drawing for GARDEN SOUFFLE

USPTO serial 75778883

GARDEN SOUFFLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GARDEN SOUFFLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George Lewis

GEORGE LEWIS JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 7TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003facial, hand and body skin care cream; skin cream; skin cleanser; skin cleansing cream; skin emollients; facial cleanser; skin toners; skin abrasive preparations; skin refreshing creams and lotions; skin scruffing creams and lotions; facial clay masks; skin quenching creams and lotions; skin moisturizers; wrinkle-removing skin care preparations; anti-wrinkle cream; deodorant soap; skin soap; pumice stones for personal use; creams for cellulite reduction; hair shampoo; shampoo-conditioners; hair conditioners; bath gels; bath oil; body cream; eye cream; perfume; lip primer; mascara; cologne, men's cologne; after-shave lotions; shaving cream, after-shave balmACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 30, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 30, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 27, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 11, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance