USPTO serial 75778883
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George Lewis
GEORGE LEWIS JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 7TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | facial, hand and body skin care cream; skin cream; skin cleanser; skin cleansing cream; skin emollients; facial cleanser; skin toners; skin abrasive preparations; skin refreshing creams and lotions; skin scruffing creams and lotions; facial clay masks; skin quenching creams and lotions; skin moisturizers; wrinkle-removing skin care preparations; anti-wrinkle cream; deodorant soap; skin soap; pumice stones for personal use; creams for cellulite reduction; hair shampoo; shampoo-conditioners; hair conditioners; bath gels; bath oil; body cream; eye cream; perfume; lip primer; mascara; cologne, men's cologne; after-shave lotions; shaving cream, after-shave balm | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |