USPTO serial 75778955
Serial No. 75778955
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75778955?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee N Kump
LEE N KUMP MCGUIRE WOODS BATTLE & BOOTHE LLPONE JAMES CTR901 E CARY STRICHMOND, VA 23219-4030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | HAND TOOLS, CUTTING TOOLS AND BLADES FOR HOME AND INDUSTRY, NAMELY, UTILITY KNIVES AND BLADES THEREFOR, SINGLE EDGE RAZOR BLADES, POCKET KNIVES AND BLADES THEREFOR, CARPET KNIVES AND BLADES THEREFOR, ROOFER'S KNIVES AND BLADES, THEREFOR, PUTTY KNIVES, SCRAPERS AND BLADES THEREFOR, TAPING KNIVES, CHISELS, STRIPPERS AND BLADES THEREFOR, RAZOR KNIVES AND BLADES THEREFOR, CARTON CUTTERS AND BLADES THEREFOR; CUTTING TOOLS AND BLADES FOR HOBBIES, ARTS AND CRAFTS, NAMELY HOBBY KNIVES AND BLADES THEREFOR, RAZOR SAWS AND BLADES THEREFOR | ACTIVE | Mar 13, 1975 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |